Search In Site
    Search       Register  Login
      Forum  
 
  Forum  Discussions  Forum1  not very spectacular
Previous Previous
 
Next Disabled
New Post 6/1/2009 12:14 PM
  Maryam Ansari
1 posts
No Ranking


not very spectacular 

as far as i figured out, names do play a role in this play; specially earnest itself; but there is nothing special beyond these names. the most important thing is that the names are important, without being important!

there is also nothing allusional or in addition to the names chosen for the characters, they are the usual names of the era; they suit the personas but there is nothing more; jack can be replaced with any other name at the same level.

choosing a name to refer a special way of behaving(bunbery) is also a comic trick that wild's used and worth mentioning. i don't konw if we can call it name symbolism, however it is his major maneuver on names after earnest itself. 

 
New Post 6/4/2009 11:47 AM
  Venus
2 posts
No Ranking


Re: not very spectacular 

Name symbolism doesn’t mean that names are to “mean” sth, but that names can symbolise or signify sth. Though we cannot disregard the fact that “fair” in Fairfax or the pun on Earnest and the character Ernest have a lexical meaning, I agree with the idea that in Wilde’s play, being a satire on the manners of the upper-middle class, the employment of names seems to accord more with the characters’ social stratum than merely with the lexical denotations of the word-names. As you’ve mentioned, “Jack”, for example, is what members of a lower class are named. But it brings to mind some connotations typical of a “Jack” like those of a Bohemian lifestyle, as we particularly notice in this play. What I seek in this discussion is more elaborations on these connotations with regard to the characters’ demeanours and social stratum.   

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Disabled
  Forum  Discussions  Forum1  not very spectacular
 Print  
   
DotNetNuke® is copyright 2002-2010 by DotNetNuke Corporation